4 ms·

>conveniently ignores the facts Not so, and if I wanted I could say the same to yourself. >This is simply not true. OK, I'm guessing you must work there? To

>conveniently ignores the facts Not so, and if I wanted I could say the same to yourself. >This is simply not true. OK, I'm guessing you must work there? To be that sure would indicate having knowledge that the lay man would not have. Are you able to let us in to any other information that might persuade me to come around to your line of thinking? >political asylum Remember - the charge against him currently is that of sexual assault. This isn't a political case, it's one for a crime. He sure wants it to be political as that will help him in his endeavours >I am not going to try to be an apologist for sexual assault. I am going to stop this discussion here as I am totally dismayed by your attitude to the seriousness of the crime committed. I can't see anything more positive to come from this thread. I urge you to see this without any bias and put yourself in the shoes of the alleged victim.

whamlastxmas 10y ago
>OK, I'm guessing you must work there? To be that sure would indicate having knowledge that the lay man would not have. Are you able to let us in to any other information that might persuade me to come around to your line of thinking? https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/dec/12/julian-assange-may-face-swedish-interrogation-within-days https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/dec/12/julian-assange... >The WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, may be questioned in London within days about alleged sexual offences after Ecuador indicated it had reached a bilateral deal with Sweden. >Negotiations began in June this year between Ecuador’s acting foreign minister, Xavier Lasso, and the Swedish justice ministry’s international affairs chief, Anna-Carin Svensson.