3 ms·
Just what I was thinking. It doesn't actually prevent the user from downloading the image, just makes them think that they failed to download the image (since
by MikeTV 10y ago
Just what I was thinking. It doesn't actually prevent the user from downloading the image, just makes them think that they failed to download the image (since it saves with a .htm extension).
The HTML file could be one that admonishes the user for attempting to scrape the file, all the while the file they wanted is sitting right there. A modern day Purloined Letter.
- goda90 10y agoI just right clicked on the image and saved it in Firefox and it gave me a .jpg. I was still able to change it into a working .html file by renaming it. I imagine some systems for downloading would get it messed up, but Firefox at least treats it as a JPEG when you're interacting with the image tag.