By that I mean because of their knee-jerk reaction to DRM they've completely misrepresented what the ABA's actual position is - they do not want to DRM the law,

By that I mean because of their knee-jerk reaction to DRM they've completely misrepresented what the ABA's actual position is - they do not want to DRM the law, but as rayiner outlines above the resolution calls for private publications incorporated into the law be available publicly (using DRM to assuage the rights-holders of the private publication).