4 ms·
Did I say anything about why he lost? In fact most of these e-mails released so far occurred after he had little chance of winning. Nope, pure distraction in an
by tanderson92 10y ago
Did I say anything about why he lost? In fact most of these e-mails released so far occurred after he had little chance of winning. Nope, pure distraction in an attempt to deflect from my points.
Also see: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056
I'm sure you'll be back to "correct the record"!
- ceejayoz 10y ago> In fact most of these e-mails released so far occurred after he had little chance of winning. That would seem to deflate your point a bit. Surely the DNC isn't violating its neutrality promise if the candidate has effectively been already chosen? > I'm sure you'll be back to "correct the record"! I've seen this thrown around several times in this thread. Is it an accusation I'm being paid by the Hillary campaign? If so, LOL.
- tanderson92 10y agoNot at all. They are to remain neutral as long as they claimed they were. Sanders was still an active candidate through the DC primary, and he actively contested the California primary. The candidate had not been chosen, but the DNC lackeys (edit: sorry, top officials) were coordinating media coverage against him.