4 ms·
> if everyone blocked ads, we'd have no free content. That's right! If people did not pay for using software, there would be no... oh wait... I am writing from
by dpc_pw 10y ago
> if everyone blocked ads, we'd have no free content.
That's right! If people did not pay for using software, there would be no... oh wait... I am writing from Linux, using Firefox... and have a github tab open...
But if people did not pay for encyclopedias... oh wait...
In fact, if companies could not monetize on ads, less clicbaiting, useless and worthless crap would be created. Sure there would be much less content overall. But most of it is useless anyway. Quality content would be behind membership payments, or just free, published by entusiasts.
The web was thriving before pay-per-view ad-fueled-cancer has consumed it with masses of ignorant clickers, so interested in Kim Kardashian meals.
Sure... things progressed somewhat, fuelled by all that money. But let's make it clear - it had it's price, changing a vision of free medium of sharing knowledge and communicating, into a centralized shopping mall, tracking your every move.
- simbalion 10y agoThere was a period of time, after the bubble and before ad-blockers, when the world wide web was a parasitic minefield of flashing imagines and clickbait and malware. Then someone invented AdBlock and the web was suddenly fun to use again. People who've grown up in an ad-block era have no idea how bad it used to be. They didn't have to watch this amazing new "internet" being destroyed by greedy crooks who themselves barely understood the technology.
- codeddesign 10y agoad-block era??? This is relatively new. There is no era yet ;) It's like saying "The Pokemon Go Era"