>I don't have Excel, so I'll start writing a Ruby DSL to implement this right away. You didn't listen to a word he said. I mean, just do the smallest list pos

>I don't have Excel, so I'll start writing a Ruby DSL to implement this right away. You didn't listen to a word he said. I mean, just do the smallest list possible that you can fit into your head (so that you don't need Excel): this can only have two items if you want--find an Excel alternative; write a Ruby DSL. Weight those the way he said, and you will end up crossing the Ruby DSL off of your list.