3 ms·
I do agree when these strangers are living and breathing human beings. But when the stranger is an institution whose sole purpose of being and the only ethics d
by beefield 10y ago
I do agree when these strangers are living and breathing human beings. But when the stranger is an institution whose sole purpose of being and the only ethics defined by the owners of the institution (and even law?) is to extract as much net value from me as possible, I have difficulties understanding why I should still play with the rule book for good guys. If this makes me a bad person, so be it. Can't say I am too ashamed of that...