3 ms·
>with no accountability whatsoever. The legislation has been delayed so that the government can implement "transparency and accountability" measures. >It's a
by jstevens85 17y ago
>with no accountability whatsoever.
The legislation has been delayed so that the government can implement "transparency and accountability" measures.
>It's a great way for a government to get its foot in the door into controlling what information is acceptable for its citizens to consume.
Get its foot in the door? The scope of the internet filter censorship will be identical to what already exists for traditional media - books, magazines, films and video games. The government already has its foot in the door. What's happened is that since 1996 they've started to lose grip, and this legislation is an ineffectual attempt to regain the control the government had 15 years ago. However, as the trial report and Conroy himself have stated, the filter will be trivial to bypass.
- netcan 17y agoIn many ways, worse. Stopping a book from being published is a relatively active act. Adding anther domain to the filter is a very low hurdle.
- nopassrecover 17y agoThe internet isn't media, it is the domain in which modern citizens conduct business, exchange ideas and interact with one another. Censoring the internet isn't like censoring books - it's like policing social clubs, mobile phones, political organisations and retail stores.