3 ms·
Then you leadership is not doing it right. Cases should take days at most, more then that they should be broken up. The whole point of Kanban is to have everyt
by UK-AL 10y ago
Then you leadership is not doing it right. Cases should take days at most, more then that they should be broken up.
The whole point of Kanban is to have everything visible and known. If your not looking at the Kanban board and taking action based things that look wrong whats the point?
- lmm 10y ago> Then you leadership is not doing it right. Cases should take days at most, more then that they should be broken up. It's easy - and useless - to make this about people. The point is, this is a problem that we didn't have under Scrum, with the same people. > The whole point of Kanban is to have everything visible and known. If your not looking at the Kanban board and taking action based things that look wrong whats the point? At what point does it look wrong? If the idea is to have everything visible why does Kanban generally include fewer stats than other processes? I was always told the "whole point" was limiting work in progress.
- UK-AL 10y agoIt's a problem under scrum as well. Just because the sprint is ending doesn't mean the case will finish. They just get dragged into the next sprint
- lmm 10y agoThat's not supposed to happen, and the process says that in that case you have to at the very least re-estimate. If a ticket is really taking forever, at some point the estimate for the time to finish it will be more than a sprint, at which point you're obliged to split it up.