3 ms·
I'm probably echoing others by saying this, but: I don't agree that there is even correlation between more encryption and less privacy. Even if we were not atte
by FungalRaincloud 10y ago
I'm probably echoing others by saying this, but: I don't agree that there is even correlation between more encryption and less privacy. Even if we were not attempting to subvert injustices done to us by our own governments by providing technical solutions, I believe wholeheartedly that many governments would still be attempting to decrease our privacy in every possible way. They're using increased encryption use as a scapegoat, but they have never had a shortage of scapegoats. Not employing strong crypto wherever possible would be irresponsible for the future of our privacy. Likewise, not engaging in political activism to change laws that impact our privacy would also be irresponsible. We need to do both, whenever possible and necessary.
- michael_fine 10y agoTypically (in the US) it's been the executive branch that has tried to subvert privacy (see COINTELPRO), and the judicial which has (sometimes) upheld it. However, because crypto would actively impede the ability of the judicial branch to use warrants, I imagine it would alienate our typical ally.
- FungalRaincloud 10y agoThat might be true, and that's a conversation we should definitely have, as we decide how we will be governed in the future. But that alone does not mean less crypto is preferable.