4 ms·
This feels very cheap to me. Monster is a well established brand with many uses and the monetization path is clear. I suppose Monster is losing to LinkedIn for
by TorKlingberg 10y ago
This feels very cheap to me. Monster is a well established brand with many uses and the monetization path is clear. I suppose Monster is losing to LinkedIn for higher paid jobs.
- ryporter 10y agoMonster's P/E ratio yesterday was around 65. Given that the company is far from a high-growth startup, that suggests that this deal isn't cheap. (That's not to say this is a bad deal -- the synergies between online and offline recruitment make sense.)
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- martinald 10y agoPretty crazy that such a well know brand still, after all this time, is not making great profits. I would have guessed that monster was a massive unicorn spinning out loads of cash in the fees they charge recruiters, turns out they're not at all.