3 ms·
> exercise a non-liquid, highly volatile financial instrument? Buy something that can't be converted quickly and easily back into cash (non-liquid), and whose
by senko 10y ago
> exercise a non-liquid, highly volatile financial instrument?
Buy something that can't be converted quickly and easily back into cash (non-liquid), and whose value changes a lot (highly volatile). This means if it starts to go down, you can't get rid of it fast enough and you stand to lose a lot.
> the expected value equation, given that Good Technology was nowhere near exit
The value equation would be, the outcome ($) times the likelihood of that outcome. So the outcome might be big, but the chance for it is perceived to be small (given that they were nowhere near exit), so the expected value is not very high.
Boils down to they spent their hard-earned cash buying something that might lose a lot of value, is unlikely to be a big win, and that they, once they buy it, are basically stuck with it. No wonder he disses the advisors (note all of this is just explanation of what is said, without judging if his premises are correct).
- mosselman 10y agoThank you for the explanation. Would 'buy something' in this case mean to choose options over 'normal' compensation (salary)? Or were employees advised to buy extra options in the company at some point? Also, I thought there was a difference between options and equity and the assumption I have heard some people have is that 'equity' is safer than 'options', but if I think about it now it seems as if options are just what equity consists of. Is there a difference and does one consist of the other? While I understand that I should probably consult Duck Duck Go on this some more, I still ask seeing as you seem to be knowledgeable on the subject.