3 ms·
A very interesting topic (optimization) and the documentation does a good job at introducing it. I also like the facts that the author published under an open s
by kluck 10y ago
A very interesting topic (optimization) and the documentation does a good job at introducing it. I also like the facts that the author published under an open source license and that he is financed/employed by a company that does all the heavy lifting like accounting and marketing.
Is there a reason why the author choses the Apache Software License over something similar like the LGPL?
Some people here tend to think the author could have made a lot more money if he would have turned the software into a for profit business right from the start. This may be so but, aside from beeing a lot more work in non-programming areas, this would probably not have generated the other effects that occurred: the author learned a lot more by participating in the programming community and also created a valuable relationship with a company. Both these effects open up new ideas and possibilities, be it intellectually or in terms of business opportunities.
- ljw1001 10y agoLGPL is not similar in one important way. Any reference to GPL in a license scares the shit out of corporate managers and lawyers when it's attached to something in their proprietary code. That discourages business use and adoption, sadly, which slows down adoption overall.