5 ms·
> Why fight this losing trend when you could easily dual boot or even have a dedicated gaming rig? Because I don't want to pay Microsoft. Because I don't want
by wtbob 10y ago
> Why fight this losing trend when you could easily dual boot or even have a dedicated gaming rig?
Because I don't want to pay Microsoft. Because I don't want Microsoft to collect my data. Because I care about my freedom. What better reason is there?
- sfifs 10y agoSure. But then folks like you need to be willing to pay the game developer whatever it costs them to hire an engineering bench to maintain a linux port - ideally with significantly higher profitability than the windows version to make it worth the effort.
- wtbob 10y ago> But then folks like you need to be willing to pay the game developer whatever it costs them to hire an engineering bench to maintain a linux port - ideally with significantly higher profitability than the windows version to make it worth the effort. I've no problem paying for Linux games. At one point I spent quite a bit on Humble Bundles (before they got boring), and I always paid twice what the averages for Windows & (then) OS X were.
- Erwin 10y agoA Humble Bundle is a last-ditch effort to sell an old game -- appealing to hoarders for the company to gain some publicity (as some just give all to chaity). The last "2K" bundle had $360 worth of games -- for $8.97 and only a small proportion of that comes back to the company. If you want to support Linux as a platform, I recommend you donate at higher e.g. $50 or $100 tiers to Kickstarter projects that have Linux stretch goals and be vocal about your donation. Paying 5% of the sale price years after the game has come out doesn't strike me like fruitful.
- shmerl 10y ago> But then folks like you need to be willing to pay the game developer whatever it costs them to hire an engineering bench to maintain a linux port Many Linux users do. Especially with backing crowdfunded games which pledge Linux support.