The article says that to have quality, someone needs to be responsible for it. Of course, the "Bazaar" included the project named "Linux," which does have a si

The article says that to have quality, someone needs to be responsible for it. Of course, the "Bazaar" included the project named "Linux," which does have a single person in charge. So "single person in charge (or not in charge)" isn't really what the bazaar is about. More generally, the article laments the lack of quality in modern software. I don't think that's a problem of Cathedral vs Bazaar, though, since software designed top down with authority telling everyone what to do can be low quality (indeed, you can see this sort of thing happening in many scrum style companies). Rather low quality software is a reflection of the skill of the people who built it.