4 ms·

Define 'most phones' (Not being able to replace the battery is a problem in my world). Buying a new (crappy, what do you expect for 50 Dollars?) phone because

Define 'most phones' (Not being able to replace the battery is a problem in my world). Buying a new (crappy, what do you expect for 50 Dollars?) phone because your perfectly working one isn't supported anymore is NOT satisfying and not a solution. Windows XP is actually a very nice example. According to Wikipedia it came out in 2001 and got constant (you can complain about the quality or bring up other complaints) updates until 2014. It's rather amusing that you bring up Windows XP as a _counter argument_ to decent updates. Most phone manufacturers have a hard time updating their devices for 1.5 to 2 years, let alone 13. I feel that you're a bit lost. You want to save a bit of money ($50 is your example) when you purchase a new device because if it's becoming vulnerable due to a crappy manufacturer/vendor you can always .. get a different one for the same price? Ignoring that this doesn't make sense, you're also hurting the 'herd immunity'. This argument of yours is comparable to anti-vaccines discussions. "I want .." vs. "The general public would benefit if this would be the case". I know what Kirk and Spock would decide, but you're entitled to have a different opinion, of course.

01Michael10 10y ago
>Define 'most phones' (Not being able to replace the battery is a problem in my world). In my world too but most smartphones sold these days in fact do not have removable batteries by design. You don't know this? >Buying a new (crappy, what do you expect for 50 Dollars?) phone because your perfectly working one isn't supported anymore is NOT satisfying and not a solution That $50 phone is just as good or better than a phone sold 3 or 4 years ago. >I feel that you're a bit lost. You want to save a bit of money No dude... I buy a new phone every two years to have a faster one, better features (camera), and better security features (fingerprint reader). Lucky me, I can afford it. My secondary phone is a 2 1/2 year old Nexus 5 which still gets security updates and will for many more years via custom ROMs. Security updates were not the reason I bought a new phone. Sorry, you don't really seem to be up on current smartphone technology to comment on this intelligently but philosophically I do agree with you.
- petecox 10y ago
  Nexus 4, released in Oct 2012, is still better spec-wise in terms of screen and RAM than most $50 devices. I picked up one on ebay for $AU80 and the battery is still okay but the non-replaceable feature the only thing keeping me from using it indefinitely. Although the supported OS is Google abandonware, so this vulnerability may finally encourage me to upgrade to a custom ROM. (And yes I'm currently a thrifty student and happy to accept hand-me-downs rather than spend $500 on new bling)
  - 01Michael10 10y ago
    That is not correct... You know I am taking about the $50 Amazon Blu and Moto Prime deals? Please look up their hardware specifications. The Nexus 4 was a solid beautiful phone in it's time. It doesn't even officially support LTE and I can name 6 other specs were it comes up short compared to the Amazon Prime phones. Google abandonware? Nexus devices get better official and unofficial support than any other Android OEM phones.

01Michael10 10y ago

>Define 'most phones' (Not being able to replace the battery is a problem in my world). In my world too but most smartphones sold these days in fact do not have removable batteries by design. You don't know this? >Buying a new (crappy, what do you expect for 50 Dollars?) phone because your perfectly working one isn't supported anymore is NOT satisfying and not a solution That $50 phone is just as good or better than a phone sold 3 or 4 years ago. >I feel that you're a bit lost. You want to save a bit of money No dude... I buy a new phone every two years to have a faster one, better features (camera), and better security features (fingerprint reader). Lucky me, I can afford it. My secondary phone is a 2 1/2 year old Nexus 5 which still gets security updates and will for many more years via custom ROMs. Security updates were not the reason I bought a new phone. Sorry, you don't really seem to be up on current smartphone technology to comment on this intelligently but philosophically I do agree with you.

petecox 10y ago
Nexus 4, released in Oct 2012, is still better spec-wise in terms of screen and RAM than most $50 devices. I picked up one on ebay for $AU80 and the battery is still okay but the non-replaceable feature the only thing keeping me from using it indefinitely. Although the supported OS is Google abandonware, so this vulnerability may finally encourage me to upgrade to a custom ROM. (And yes I'm currently a thrifty student and happy to accept hand-me-downs rather than spend $500 on new bling)
- 01Michael10 10y ago
  That is not correct... You know I am taking about the $50 Amazon Blu and Moto Prime deals? Please look up their hardware specifications. The Nexus 4 was a solid beautiful phone in it's time. It doesn't even officially support LTE and I can name 6 other specs were it comes up short compared to the Amazon Prime phones. Google abandonware? Nexus devices get better official and unofficial support than any other Android OEM phones.