3 ms·
Source on productivity? And whether or not individual workers are more productive, French mega-corporations seem to have much less of a global reach than Americ
by ringwalt 10y ago
Source on productivity? And whether or not individual workers are more productive, French mega-corporations seem to have much less of a global reach than American or German ones. I can't think of many French products that are common in the US other than cosmetics (that's an anecdotal argument though).
- toomuchtodo 10y ago> Source on productivity? https://www.google.com/search?q=france+productivity https://www.google.com/search?q=france+productivity Global reach is only enriching shareholders, not the middle class.
- buckbova 10y agoFrench are not more productive per capita, but more productive per capita/hour. There's a big difference here. Obviously there's diminishing returns after X hours of work in a day or week, but there are still returns.
- toomuchtodo 10y ago> French are not more productive per capita, but more productive per capita/hour. So they're more efficient, while Americans are more productive because they work longer hours with less holiday. > There's a big difference here. Obviously there's diminishing returns after X hours of work in a day or week, but there are still returns. But where those returns are going are most important for this discussion. And they are not going to workers.
- user5994461 10y agoThere is a very simple way to have French be more productive per hours. Let's compare a French and an American... - The French guy works 9 to 6. It's accounted as 35 hours and he gets paid for 35 hours. - The American guy works 9 to 6. It's accounted as 40 hours and he gets paid for 40 hours. They both do and produce the same thing. The statistics say that the French is more productive per hour ;)
- toomuchtodo 10y agoYou forget that the American is working 50-60 hours, and only being paid for 40. "Adults employed full time in the U.S. report working an average of 47 hours per week, almost a full workday longer than what a standard five-day, 9-to-5 schedule entails. In fact, half of all full-time workers indicate they typically work more than 40 hours, and nearly four in 10 say they work at least 50 hours." https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2014/09/02/the-average-work-week-is-now-47-hours/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2014/09... http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/09/news/economy/americans-work-bush/ http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/09/news/economy/americans-work-... http://www.gallup.com/poll/175286/hour-workweek-actually-longer-seven-hours.aspx http://www.gallup.com/poll/175286/hour-workweek-actually-lon...
- user5994461 10y agoDoes the American works 9 to 9? Anyway, I'd love to see a study that compare countries: - What time people say they do? - What time people actually do? - What time get accounted and paid for? That would be very interesting.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- malloryerik 10y agoAnother possible angle (to be mixed and matched with the original): French guy works 35 hours (ok really 38) and is busy all the time at work. Korean guy works 60 hours (ok really 55) and spends much of it 1) recovering from semi-mandatory drinking with the boss and colleagues, 2) browsing / shopping online, 3) chatting on KakaoTalk, often while 4) waiting for his boss to leave so that he can also, or 5) if working diligently, often on polishing pointless powerpoint presentations.