4 ms·
On the contrary, there IS a detailed, well-thought-out defense of the OpenCog design, but it's sufficiently complicated that the casual observer may not be able
by bengoertzel 17y ago
On the contrary, there IS a detailed, well-thought-out defense of the OpenCog design, but it's sufficiently complicated that the casual observer may not be able to appreciate it. Wait for the book "Building Better Minds" (http://opencog.org/wiki/Building_Better_Minds http://opencog.org/wiki/Building_Better_Minds).. to be available later this year... for a detailed treatment of the theoretical foundations of OpenCog. Or for a few clues see http://goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2009/general_ai.htm http://goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2009/general_ai.htm and the references therein. For a crisp write-up of many of the ideas, and a comparison to other AGI approaches, see the proposal http://www.goertzel.org/CogBot_public.pdf http://www.goertzel.org/CogBot_public.pdf . -- Ben Goertzel, leader of OpenCog ...
- jey 17y agoLooking forward to it, Ben. And while I respectfully disagree on principles, I greatly appreciate the work you do to advance thought and discussion on these issues.