3 ms·
"my first thought was that the strength needed for stackability wouldn't jive with a crushable bottle" The author of the article should try to crash a closed b
by tomerico 17y ago
"my first thought was that the strength needed for stackability wouldn't jive with a crushable bottle"
The author of the article should try to crash a closed bottle... He would both learn physics and understand why his claim is wrong.
- electromagnetic 17y agoAgreed, his sentence doesn't jive. The author obviously doesn't realise that a 371ml coke bottle contains 1.4 litres of carbon dioxide and a square bottle would likely require 4-times the plastic to remain in a square enough shape that it wouldn't affect packaging shape. I don't buy that this bottle would be eco-friendly in the short or long run.
- thristian 17y agoI guess it would be more accurate to say "the strength needed to contain pressurized Coke wouldn't jive with a crushable bottle", and stackability just comes as a freebie?