3 ms·
Huh? You're implying that the OP's work friend(s) were romantically attracted to them, and then secretly turned against them because they didn't notice and reci
by PhasmaFelis 10y ago
Huh? You're implying that the OP's work friend(s) were romantically attracted to them, and then secretly turned against them because they didn't notice and reciprocate? Why would you assume something so convoluted on so little evidence?
...Oh. Because the OP has a female user name, and that's all the evidence you need.
Classy.
- hackity 10y agoI was sarcastically implying she was juxtaposing a high level of kindhearted sincerity in a Machiavellian manner, while those who hated her embodied disreputable traits. However I was only so thoughtful to her, because of the user's female username.
- PhasmaFelis 10y agoIf my sarcasmometer is calibrated correctly, I believe you've run afoul of Poe's Law.