3 ms·
The Palestinian Journalists Front (PFJ) slammed Google for the move, stating that the removal of Palestine’s name from the maps was an attempt by the “Israeli s
by kafkaesq 10y ago
The Palestinian Journalists Front (PFJ) slammed Google for the move, stating that the removal of Palestine’s name from the maps was an attempt by the “Israeli scheme to establish its name as a legitimate state for generations to come” while obliterating Palestine forever. ... PJF claimed the move was part of an effort to distort history and geography “as well as the Palestinian people’s right to their homeland,” and “a failed attempt to tamper with the memory of Palestinians and Arabs.”
The fact that there is no such entity as the State of Palestine did not come up in the attack.
Objectively, there most definitely is an entity known as the State of Palestine -- it's just that the Israel stands nearly alone in the world disputing this designation:
The State of Palestine (Arabic: دولة فلسطين Dawlat Filasṭīn), also known simply as Palestine, is a de jure sovereign state in the Middle East that is recognized by 136 UN members and since 2012 has a status of a non-member observer state in the United Nations – which amounts to a de facto, or implicit, recognition of statehood. The State of Palestine claims the West Bank (bordering Israel and Jordan) and Gaza Strip (bordering Israel and Egypt) with East Jerusalem as the designated capital.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Palestine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Palestine
The term "Palestinian Territory, Occupied" had been utilized by the UN and other international organizations between 1998 to 2013 in order to refer to the Palestinian National Authority; it was replaced in UN Secretariat communications by the term State of Palestine starting in 2012, and the ISO adopted the name change in 2013.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories
So one would think that the ISO and UN designation would be the one that Google would go by.
- doug1001 10y agothank you for this "annotation" to the OP; the sentence in the OP "The fact that there is no such entity as the State of Palestine...." is intended so clearly as a factual assertion ("The fact that....") that i assumed it must be not just correct but verifiable correct. In fact just the opposite is true.
- Svip 10y agoAmusingly, the article itself quotes the very same text two paragraphs below the statement declaring that the State of Palestine doesn't exist as an entity.