5 ms·

I was rooting for a full WYSIWYG editor, but it doesn't look like they'll be doing that. I wonder how the new edit toolbar does in real world usability testing.

by cmelbye 17y ago

neilk 17y ago
Hi there. I happen to be on the Wikimedia Usability team, but on a separate project from the ones discussed here. The team did their latest formal usability test just last week. Those results will be posted soon. In the meantime, the results of the October 2009 usability testing are here: http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability,_Experience,_and_Progress_Study http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability,_Experience,_a... In addition, they've been tracking the retention rates of people who try the beta: http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Beta_Feedback_Survey http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Beta_Feedback_Survey As for a WYSIWYG editor -- I can't speak for that team, but pretty much everyone agrees that this is required if we're going to achieve the goal of an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. The WMF has recently instituted some permanent positions related to user experience, so stay tuned, or, get involved.
- cmelbye 17y ago
  Oh, sounds cool. I'm a MediaWiki developer, but I haven't been terribly active lately. I'm going to get back into it soon, and I want to focus on usability because I believe that usability (or lack thereof) is the number one blocker to the adoption of wikis to people not familiar with them.
- jacobolus 17y ago
  I don’t care so much about WYSIWYG (I’d personally leave it off), but if it were possible to do some syntax highlighting in the editor boxes I think that would be tremendously useful. Not sure where the best place to send feedback is, but one concern I have is that the text box used for entry breaks/removes Safari’s neat bottom-right-corner box resizer widget that usually shows up for textarea elements. Anyone here know what causes it to show up/disappear?

I was rooting for a full WYSIWYG editor, but it doesn't look like they'll be doing that. I wonder how the new edit toolbar does in real world usability testing.

by cmelbye 17y ago

I was rooting for a full WYSIWYG editor, but it doesn't look like they'll be doing that. I wonder how the new edit toolbar does in real world usability testing.

neilk 17y ago

Hi there. I happen to be on the Wikimedia Usability team, but on a separate project from the ones discussed here. The team did their latest formal usability test just last week. Those results will be posted soon. In the meantime, the results of the October 2009 usability testing are here: http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability,_Experience,_and_Progress_Study http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability,_Experience,_a... In addition, they've been tracking the retention rates of people who try the beta: http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Beta_Feedback_Survey http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Beta_Feedback_Survey As for a WYSIWYG editor -- I can't speak for that team, but pretty much everyone agrees that this is required if we're going to achieve the goal of an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. The WMF has recently instituted some permanent positions related to user experience, so stay tuned, or, get involved.

cmelbye 17y ago
Oh, sounds cool. I'm a MediaWiki developer, but I haven't been terribly active lately. I'm going to get back into it soon, and I want to focus on usability because I believe that usability (or lack thereof) is the number one blocker to the adoption of wikis to people not familiar with them.
jacobolus 17y ago
I don’t care so much about WYSIWYG (I’d personally leave it off), but if it were possible to do some syntax highlighting in the editor boxes I think that would be tremendously useful. Not sure where the best place to send feedback is, but one concern I have is that the text box used for entry breaks/removes Safari’s neat bottom-right-corner box resizer widget that usually shows up for textarea elements. Anyone here know what causes it to show up/disappear?