3 ms·
"As someone else pointed out "growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of a cancer cell"." Not really. Cancer cells are destructive. Growth in and of its
by jomamaxx 10y ago
"As someone else pointed out "growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of a cancer cell"."
Not really. Cancer cells are destructive.
Growth in and of itself is not.
In some ways - i.e. 'deforestation' - yes.
But almost all medical advances for example amount to 'growth' and almost all of them are 'great'.
Most of the economy is now in services and not things tied directly to 'energy or resource consumption' - ergo, growth is almost entirely positive in the general sense.
'Growth' usually means: better meds, better entertainment, faster and safer travel, more access to education, less poverty, cooler stuff. Usually.
- collyw 10y agoMore hours worked, more stress, more environmental destruction.
- jomamaxx 10y ago"More hours worked, more stress, more environmental destruction." We have been working fewer hours for about 30 years. You're stressed because your too busy doing to much stuff.
- collyw 10y agoNo we haven't been working less hours. Women have been added to the workforce, so we have close to twice as many people working now. Stress is increasing in society generally.