3 ms·
"Who knows what evidence can be collected if the rulebook is thrown away" Pretty much all Europeans - the legality of evidence here is only refused in very int
by paulhilbert 10y ago
"Who knows what evidence can be collected if the rulebook is thrown away"
Pretty much all Europeans - the legality of evidence here is only refused in very intense cases (read: torture). And it works quite well tbh...
- alex_hitchins 10y agoI would be interested to hear of any cases where in-admissable evidence is deemed admissable for the purposes of finding someone guilty. As a European (currently!) I would not want to allow this to continue.
- coldtea 10y ago>for the purposes of finding someone guilty Also for finding someone innocent. You forgot that. >As a European (currently!) I would not want to allow this to continue. Because its drawbacks are?
- alex_hitchins 10y ago>>for the purposes of finding someone guilty >Also for finding someone innocent. You forgot that. True, some people may want to break the law to gain evidence to support someones defense. I have a gut feeling this is going to be in the minority of cases. >>As a European (currently!) I would not want to allow this to continue. >Because its drawbacks are? It's drawbacks are mainly being that it would be a massive retrograde step.