3 ms·
the food is not just rated on taste and the decor (or lack of it in this case) is not a significant factor afaik. From my extensive research[1] the reviewer tak
by kagamine 10y ago
the food is not just rated on taste and the decor (or lack of it in this case) is not a significant factor afaik. From my extensive research[1] the reviewer takes into account:
1. taste
2. presentation
3. use of local ingredients
4. use of fresh quality ingredients
[1]every episode of Gordon Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares UK.
- ktta 10y agoI think one of the important factors is the consistency of the food (taste, presentation, etc.). I learnt this from my research[0] [0] Jiro Dreams of Sushi on Netflix (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1772925/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1772925/)
- titanix2 10y agoWhen I was child my grand father sometimes took me to a restaurant he said didn't get a star because the parking lot wasn't big enough. So I believe they rate restaurant no just on the food, or at least they used to. I'm right now eating at a takoyaki place in Osaka which is referenced in the guide (no star thought) so I guess criterions were somewhat adapted to deal with foreign food culture.