> No. That time has already passed. If we see signs that the star will go nova "in one year", we have one year, not 1481. He specifically referred to something

> No. That time has already passed. If we see signs that the star will go nova "in one year", we have one year, not 1481. He specifically referred to something traveling at half of the speed of light, in which case it would arrive in >=1480 years not one.