3 ms·
Yes, but one shouldn't say that the move is for the general upliftment or rather for the benefit of mankind at large. It's obvious that the returns from these
by 0xmohit 10y ago
Yes, but one shouldn't say that the move is for the general upliftment or rather for the benefit of mankind at large.
It's obvious that the returns from these sorts of investment are much higher.
- icebraining 10y agoWhy can't it be both? Frankly, the outrage seems disproportioned. Unlike Facebook with its Internet.org site, Google didn't even paint it as charity, they only said it's a problem that they (along with others) are addressing, which is what every companies does. "General upliftment" and "benefit of mankind at large" are your words.