4 ms·
Esperanto seems to have learned its lesson and made itself un-changable, but forkable. > The only basis of the Esperanto language binding on all Esperantists,
by chillacy 10y ago
Esperanto seems to have learned its lesson and made itself un-changable, but forkable.
> The only basis of the Esperanto language binding on all Esperantists, which no one has the right to change, is the little work Foundation of Esperanto. If anyone deviates from the rules and models given in the said work, he can never justify himself with the words "thus desires or advises the author of Esperanto".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_evolution_of_Esperanto https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_evolution_of_Esperanto
Changing the language too much is "kontraŭ fundamento"
- mcguire 10y agoI have seen complaints about "aeroporto" vs. "flugaveno" (?) though.
- D-Coder 10y ago"Flughaveno" (flight-port). Similarly "flugmaŝino" (flight-machine) has generally disappeared for "aviadilo" (sort of "aviation-er"). Some of the vocabulary has drifted with technological and social changes. For example "svati," to matchmake, this has pretty much disappeared. But the grammar has changed very little.