4 ms·
Well, you could always just use startpage.com (uses Google) or duckduckgo.com. It's not like Google is still ages ahead of the competition as it once was. I am
by Drdrdrq 10y ago
Well, you could always just use startpage.com (uses Google) or duckduckgo.com. It's not like Google is still ages ahead of the competition as it once was. I am not sure where the bug comes from but it would be much easier for Google to fix it, given that their JS is heavily obfuscated. But then again, that's not really in their interest, is it?
- eitland 10y agoBut then again, that's not really in their interest, is it? That thought struck me as well. Lets ask :-) Googlers at HN: is this a lack of QA, a deliberate stab at Firefox or something else?