3 ms·
I think some people read the title (Mozilla: “Our primary goal is to un-fork the Tor Browser”) and assumed Mozilla wants to incorporate all the Tor Browser's fe
by yohui 10y ago
I think some people read the title (Mozilla: “Our primary goal is to un-fork the Tor Browser”) and assumed Mozilla wants to incorporate all the Tor Browser's features. A closer look at the link should make it clear that the changes being discussed are more specific.
It's almost clickbait.
- int_19h 10y agoI've interpreted the title that way, too, but partly because it might actually make sense. Consider this. Firefox peaked a while ago; since then, Chrome ate every other browser's lunch, and the only browser that had user share declining faster than Firefox was IE (but even so, IE still has more users). Google has the brand recognition on their side, and on top of that, they have actually made a browser that "just works" for 99% of people out there, the way Firefox never quite did. Since contesting Chrome's market share is rather pointless, Firefox needs a niche of its own now. Integrating Tor in a seamless way would be a great opportunity to create one.
- RubyPinch 10y agoeh, the final pieces are kind of all being worked on multiprocessing to stop freezing issues and increase response speed a permissioned API for extensions, easier and saner full themes system (faster/easier development time for updates, and a wider range of extensions/themes as a result) and switching critical components to a safer language) which imo are more important for users than doing something an existing firefox fork does (like, if there was demand for firefox with seamless tor, then they would get the firefox with seamless tor today, because it already exists)