3 ms·
"it's also not fair to compare present India to colonial India, and claim that the current government is better because certain indicators are better now. " Hu
by plinkplonk 17y ago
"it's also not fair to compare present India to colonial India, and claim that the current government is better because certain indicators are better now. "
Huh? If indicators are used to prove life is worse off now in Africa say, then of course indicators can be used to prove life is better now in India. Besides, I used "indicators" for life 9 years after the British left. Penicillin doesn't account for dams and roads and schools and hospitals and no more famines (for example).
Besides, I was explicitly countering lionhearted's (original) claim that India had devolved from colonial rule, an assertion for which there was (and can be) zero evidence provided, but a lot of people here accepted and voted it up. So it seems "colonialism was a good thing" is a popular idea among people who were never colonized. Sometimes HN surprises me.
On a lighter note, when I was living in America, a co worker wanted to know if we still used elephants for transport, like they used cars! Well I preferrd the flying carpets but we had a spare elephant or two in the stables for when it rained :-P
Ok now I am done with all this historical discussion. Back to hacking!
- rsheridan6 17y ago>Huh? If indicators are used to prove life is worse off now in Africa say, then of course indicators can be used to prove life is better now in India. But technology in general has been improving, so things should be better, all other things being equal. Things may even be better if government is somewhat worse. But if things have gotten worse, you're really screwing up, so much that technology can't make up for it. I have no idea how this applies to India, just making a general point.