3 ms·
TL;DR: All the hype and rumours about a new discovery at the LHC [1][2][3][4] that looked like a particle outside of the standard model was for naught. As the L
by akiselev 10y ago
TL;DR: All the hype and rumours about a new discovery at the LHC [1][2][3][4] that looked like a particle outside of the standard model was for naught. As the LHC detectors gathered and processed more data, the "diphoton bumps" turned from interesting anomalies to statistically insignificant noise [5].
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11893164 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11893164
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11250931 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11250931
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9420043 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9420043
[4] http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/potential-new-particle-shows-up-at-the-lhc-thrilling-and-confounding-physicists1/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/potential-new-part...
[5] http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hope-for-new-particle-fizzles-at-the-lhc1/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hope-for-new-parti...
- beezle 10y agoNo that is not really the TL;DR of her post (which on her site is a condensed version of what she put on Starts with a Bang). Her main point is that the HEP community has been racing down a road for many years and probably missed the "dead end" sign some years back. In particular, she takes issue with what is called 'naturalness' and its often used justification for PBTSM. She concluded with: "I hope that this latest null result will send a clear message that you can’t trust the judgement of scientists whose future funding depends on their continued optimism."