3 ms·
> Theoretically perfect test coverage, for a particular class of bugs. But that class of bugs isn't the most prevalent class [snip] Well, except maybe is is? T
by lomnakkus 10y ago
> Theoretically perfect test coverage, for a particular class of bugs. But that class of bugs isn't the most prevalent class [snip]
Well, except maybe is is? They're certainly extremely severe when they occur. (Especially if your language is weakly typed like C/C++.)
Without the proper research, who knows? (I'm only talking about my own experience, so YMMV. I'm not even sure a proper metric for a 'fair' comparison can be constructed, even in theory, so again YMMV.)
EDIT: Just curious as a point of interest: What statically typed languages do you have non-trivial experience in? This is not a gotcha, or a haha-look-a-the-noob type question. I find that the quality of the $ST_LANG has a huuuuuuuge impact on how people perceive the value of $ST_IN_GENERAL... if that makes sense.
- mcphage 10y ago> Well, except maybe is is? They're certainly extremely severe when they occur. [...] Without the proper research, who knows? Maybe is is? In general that hasn't been my experience (they happen, but not that often, and are usually easy to figure out). I agree that research is needed to decide, but the research I've seen references doesn't seem to hold that up. But it's not something I've looked closely into; too much discussion about it ends up getting into holy war arguments, and I stay away. > I'm only talking about my own experience, so YMMV. Me as well :-) > What statically typed languages do you have non-trivial experience in? Java (which has a garbage type system) and Objective-C. I'm in the process of learning Swift and Scala, but I don't have much experience in either yet. More languages back when I was in college, but that was a while ago, and you don't really get non-trivial experience in college. > I find that the quality of the $ST_LANG has a huuuuuuuge impact on how people perceive the value of $ST_IN_GENERAL... I agree 100%. And it's not that I think ST is worthless—although Java's type system really tries its damnedest to make it worthless—but spending most of my time in Ruby, one of the wildest-west languages out there, I still don't find type errors cropping up very often, or being a major issue when they do. On occasion, sure, one can be hard to find. But they're really not a major source of error in my day-to-day life; and if ever a language were susceptible to them, it's Ruby. Still, if the language used matters that much, then it's not just ST that's the solution, it's ST with a certain level of sophistication.