4 ms·
FWIW, she was convicted of obstruction of justice and lying to investigators, not insider trading, but I think that even furthers your point about derivative ch
by gjem97 10y ago
FWIW, she was convicted of obstruction of justice and lying to investigators, not insider trading, but I think that even furthers your point about derivative charges.
http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/05/news/companies/martha_verdict/ http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/05/news/companies/martha_verdic...
- will_brown 10y agoYes you are right. To be more accurate, I should have said convicted of some of the charges on the underlying insider trading case not the insider trading charges (as you note, not for the actual count of insider trading itself but the accompanying charges). I may have subconsciously done that because the counts she was convicted of blur with new charge and I wanted to distinguish the underlying case/charges with the new charge which was triggered by claiming innocence of the underlying case.