3 ms·
Thanks. It looks like you were mixing up two different time periods then. The US income tax was only ratified in 1913, which would put its creation to just a y
by true_religion 10y ago
Thanks. It looks like you were mixing up two different time periods then.
The US income tax was only ratified in 1913, which would put its creation to just a year before World War 1.
So the US "survived" just about 124 years of modern civilisation without an income tax.
I don't realistically think that anyone is talking about returning to the days of the "Confederacy" that lasted what 2-3 years back in the 1700s, but the fact of the matter is that you have a lot of latitude in how you can separate powers between different governmental bodies and not collapse as a country.
If you were to replace the direct federal income tax with a levee on individual states (whom then go on to decide how and when to tax their residents), I doubt the government will 'collapse'.
Now to be fair, the US is a lot more decentralised than many European countries yet it is still more centralised than its northern neighbour Canada.
- Mz 10y agoNo, I am not mixing up anything. You and I are just focused on different pieces of the GP statement. Suggesting, as you are, that things could be monetized differently is a rather different position from decrying the role the federal government plays and actively advocating for essentially hamstringing it.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> The US income tax was only ratified in 1913, which would put its creation to just a year before World War 1. The US had an income tax before that. What was ratified was a Constitutional amendment giving the federal government plenary and independent power to levy an income tax.