I've seen this argument before, and it still seems odd to me. I get the argument of paying more for convenience, but comparing to buying every possible other se

I've seen this argument before, and it still seems odd to me. I get the argument of paying more for convenience, but comparing to buying every possible other service at once annoys me. Most cable cutters I know are smart about it. They pay for one or two services, for less than a quarter the cost of cable. For variety, you can stop one subscription and start another, say when you finish binge watching a show available on Netflix and want to watch something on Hulu. Do you really watch so much TV that you need "3 out of 4 of the premium movie channels, sling tv, an antennae with DVR from Amazon, Netflix, maybe Hulu or something else" all at once?