6 ms·
The real federated social platform is WordPress, which has millions of deployments and serves a quarter of the most popular websites: https://w3techs.com/techno
by erlehmann_ 10y ago
The real federated social platform is WordPress, which has millions of deployments and serves a quarter of the most popular websites:
https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management/all/ https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management...
I still remember the time around ten years ago when a lot of people had independent blogs mostly free of clickbait and advertising. Nowadays, many post on social media only.
- kordless 10y agoWordpress is not a federated platform, unless one wants to redefine federation.
- erlehmann_ 10y agoIn networked software, to be federated means users are able to send messages from one independent deployment to the other. In WordPress, this is achieved using linkbacks and feeds. So how would you define federation?
- pjbrunet 10y agoAfter Gravatars, I figured they'd try to disrupt Facebook with some kind of P2P plugin, like a Fidonet. But it never happened. Instead we got Disqus and IntenseDebate and bbPress...
- djsumdog 10y agoRSS can be considered a federated protocol, maybe...if you stretch the definition. With RSS, you can subscribe to feeds with any standard reader. Interestingly enough, YouTube channels all have RSS feeds, so you can subscribe to them without needing to do so via a Google account.
- pjbrunet 10y agoI wrote nearly the same thing last week. "I remember meritocracy, I remember trackbacks..." HN definitely helps to amplify the independent WP blogs' news. I was thinking, maybe there's a way to do P2P ranking/voting/tagging of headlines just using JavaScript, maybe it's an embed code, and that could disrupt Twitter in terms of surfacing important news items without censorship. But how scary would it turn out without censorship?