3 ms·
I have this problem too. It's not hard to set up, there are just so many tiny pieces that need to be run by hand that it's going to take a human well over an ho
by Karunamon 10y ago
I have this problem too. It's not hard to set up, there are just so many tiny pieces that need to be run by hand that it's going to take a human well over an hour to read through the docs and get it right.
Someone made a Saltstack state[1] that I've used and had some success with - installing and configuring Salt from zero and using this config is still faster than installing Phabricator by hand.
[1]: https://github.com/bougie/salt-phabricator-formula https://github.com/bougie/salt-phabricator-formula
- lima 10y agoIt's actually much easier to setup and operate than GitLab with its massive dependencies. Also a lot faster.
- Karunamon 10y agoGitlab is unfortunately a pig, in the large and bloated sense of the term. Which is really sad! I love the app, it looks better than Phabricator and does so much more, but then I can throw Phabricator on the same droplet I use for plenty of other stuff with resources to spare for $5/month, where Gitlab would require a dedicated $10 instance just due to memory usage alone. Guess I'm just not the target audience :(
- brodock 10y agoYou can use gitlab.com for free... don't need to install it in your own box.
- jobvandervoort 10y agoSetting up GitLab can be done through our repositories quite easily nowadays. It boils down to: apt-get install gitlab-ce
- cookiesboxcar 10y agoI'm talking specifically about the client tool arcanist, which IMO is the real benefit of Phabricator