16 ms·
> This article didn't point out any reason I would trade git for the much slower Bazaar, just said that Bazaar is not as bad as it looks on the Git is Better Th
by stevelosh 17y ago
> This article didn't point out any reason I would trade git for the much slower Bazaar, just said that Bazaar is not as bad as it looks on the Git is Better Than X website. That's not really a very convincing argument if I'm already using git.
I'm guessing that's why the article is titled "Why Git Ain't Better Than X" and not "Why Bazaar is Better Than Git"...
- cookiecaper 17y agoWell, it doesn't show that Git isn't better, it just shows that Bazaar isn't as bad as it seems on that site. Probably just because of updates to bzr since it was made.
- ableal 17y agoA couple of weeks ago (apropos http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1180434 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1180434) I looked up the 'advertising' at http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-bazaar.html http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-b... For v2.0+, they quote 1.0 sec commits on the Firefox 3.5 repo test (vs. 1.1 for hg, 0.35 for git). [Pointers to binary data performance figures (e.g. repo size deltas vs. SVN, etc.) gratefully accepted]