4 ms·
We do our best to make CE and EE excellent, where the features that land in EE are mostly interesting for larger teams. For every feature that we don't bring to
by jobvandervoort 10y ago
We do our best to make CE and EE excellent, where the features that land in EE are mostly interesting for larger teams. For every feature that we don't bring to CE, this is always a hard decision.
We wrote about this here: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/01/11/being-a-good-open-source-steward/ https://about.gitlab.com/2016/01/11/being-a-good-open-source...
- throwanem 10y agoI'd love to see an a la carte licensing option, where an organization could start with stock CE and license just the features they need. I realize that'd be a bear to implement, though.
- thinkMOAR 10y agoHoi Job :) mogguh I understand, and money has to be made too. It's a nasty trade off. Though as i wrote to the other reply, its the service that is worth the money not necessarily the feature(s). IMHO, there is always a certain percentage of users that want to pay. The more users in total, the larger the amount of paying customers. And the repo mirroring would be a great feature to let me move a lot of github project users to gitlab without losing any potential updates from an upstream source. It would also allow for nice backup purposes, though you could do that now of course already with the hosted enterprise solution. But if the feature was in CE, many would be used, familiarised, to the feature, and perhaps see the added value of a backup node ($$) at gitlab.