3 ms·
Any ideas of supporting Mercurial, too?
by mikro2nd 10y ago
Any ideas of supporting Mercurial, too?
- jobvandervoort 10y agoWe're not planning to support Mercurial in the near future.
- marcinkuzminski 10y agoFor Mercurial check out RhodeCode which is also supporting some of unique Mercurial features like largefiles, phases, bookmarks.
- dvdgsng 10y agoJust to give you guys some credit: I've had the pleasure of working with RhodeCode on my previous job 2.5 years ago and it was an awesome experience. HG & Git support, full-text search, repo-specific access control, a nice gui, easy setup, etc. Unfortunately, most devs and sysadmins I talk to don't even know about your product, which is a real pity, as they all use the same inferior products and don't know what they are missing out on. Now i'm stuck with gitlab and bitbucket-server, which everyone thinks are great, but every time I log into them I silently cry out for rhodecode. Hope you guys are doing well.
- gitdude 10y agoCan you give any specific feedback about Bitbucket Server? What can we do better?
- connorshea 10y agoAnything specific we can do at GitLab so you don't feel that way when using it?
- dmitry-k 10y ago@dvdgsng We're better than ever, thanks! I don't know if you heard, RhodeCode CE is now free and open source. Feel free to join our Slack: https://rhodecode.com/join https://rhodecode.com/join We'll be rolling out a major release next week, might be the right time to spread a word to colleagues ;)