A web search found http://www.calpoly.edu/~ceenve/enve/jsczechowski/enve436/projects/UV/UV-Ozone-Peroxide.html http://www.calpoly.edu/~ceenve/enve/jsczechowski/

A web search found http://www.calpoly.edu/~ceenve/enve/jsczechowski/enve436/projects/UV/UV-Ozone-Peroxide.html http://www.calpoly.edu/~ceenve/enve/jsczechowski/enve436/pro... . > Based on these results the use of the UV/Ozone/Peroxide, especially the modified UV/Peroxide system, proved an effective process for removing and containing VOC contamination in the groundwater. The system was designed to treat 30,000 m g/l and the average influent was 25,00 m g/l. Along with the high contaminant removal, the system design conditions were met. The modified UV/Peroxide process replaced the UV/Ozone/Peroxide system, because the initial system, containing ozone, required lots of maintenance on the ozone generator and the delivery system. Ozone leaks were discovered (causing downtime) and the residual ozone proved to be corrosive in the reaction chamber. This supports the description that Lowe gave. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=UV%2FOZONE%2FPEROXIDE+TREATMENT&t=ffsb&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?q=UV%2FOZONE%2FPEROXIDE+TREATMENT&t=... seems to be a fruitful search term.