>so if anything it's a good argument against eagerly digging around looking for myths. I wouldn't read to far into the article, I don't think they are digging

>so if anything it's a good argument against eagerly digging around looking for myths. I wouldn't read to far into the article, I don't think they are digging around looking for myths so much as excavating a undocumented, historic site and using the King Arthur story for media coverage or interest. Note how everything related to King Arthur is simply added by the author of the article and all the quotes from the individuals involved in the project don't mention a thing about Arthur, but limited to: items located, potential origins of the items recovered, possible dates etc...