3 ms·
That's it. If the server is down, goodbye wikileaks. If the bank accounts are seized, goodbye wikileaks. If the leaders are imprisoned, good bye wikileaks. Fre
by pqs 17y ago
That's it. If the server is down, goodbye wikileaks. If the bank accounts are seized, goodbye wikileaks. If the leaders are imprisoned, good bye wikileaks.
Freenet offers a more resilient architecture.
- ig1 17y agoBut that's like saying you can secure a computer by sealing it an concrete box and burying it under the ocean. Wikileaks triages the data, pushes it out to the media, maintains physical drop-boxes across multiple continents, and much more. All of which requires people doing real work, the storage of data is a tiny part of the problem. And even for the storage part freenet isn't a real solution. How many journalists do you know who use freenet ? - pushing data into the public domain is useless if only a tiny handful of people have access to it.
- kierank 17y agoThey don't just have one server in one location. They're not stupid.
- pqs 16y agoOk, then they have 10 servers on 10 locations. That's not resilient enough.