5 ms·
>An obvious enhancement would be to use the WebAssembly backend of the upstream LLVM, and then using Emscripten+Binaryen to convert the generated WebAssembly to
by themihai 10y ago
>An obvious enhancement would be to use the WebAssembly backend of the upstream LLVM, and then using Emscripten+Binaryen to convert the generated WebAssembly to asm.js.
why would you convert WebAssembly to asm.js?
- jeremiep 10y agoFor browsers not yet supporting WebAssembly?
- themihai 10y agoAll the browsers supporting WebAssembly are evergreen browsers. I don't think asm.js is worth supporting once WebAssembly format stabilises(i.e. by the end of this year).
- Ace17 10y agoActually, I wanted to benefit from the Emscripten execution environment, i.e reimplementation of APIs such as the SDL. I'm not sure there's such a thing for WebAssembly yet.