3 ms·
You don't really have to make it look "current" to make it better. I think a good example is antirez blog: http://antirez.com/latest/0 http://antirez.com/latest
by Svenskunganka 10y ago
You don't really have to make it look "current" to make it better. I think a good example is antirez blog: http://antirez.com/latest/0 http://antirez.com/latest/0
It's clean, very simple and renders fine in everything, even mobile. No distracting content, proper font and font spacing.
- josteink 10y agoAnd has terrible contrast on the main page content's text making it hard to read if you have poor eyesight, poor light conditions or a poor monitor. This would probably fail a basic Universal Accessibility test based on that alone.
- sp332 10y agoI don't like low-contrast sites, but on my monitor that one is stark black-and-white. In fact there are no CSS rules for the color, and the font stack is "Inconsolata, Courier" so I don't know what the issue could be.
- brazzledazzle 10y agoNot seeing what you're describing either.
- benaiah 10y agoWhat are you talking about? The text on that page is pure black (rgb(0,0,0)) on pure white (rgba(0,0,0,0)). You literally can't get more contrast without coloring either the text or the background. This contrast circlejerk is getting incredibly annoying.
- Gigablah 10y agoIt's black and white on my MBP (Chrome). Maybe your browser is the one messing it up.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- joshuata 10y agoIt's actually very problematic from an accessibility standpoint. The entire text of each post is a single pre tag which makes it almost impossible to use with a screen reader. This is exactly why there were complaints about fancy style on websites; it often ruins the structural markup of a page.