3 ms·

They've actually done very well with "hype" as it were. I guess this goes to show that you too can spend tons of VC dollars, make yourself "popular" and never

They've actually done very well with "hype" as it were. I guess this goes to show that you too can spend tons of VC dollars, make yourself "popular" and never make any money, but the popularity is enough to make you worth money, even though you're losing money. Fascinating. I almost wonder if they should sell now, just in case they run out of VC "at some point in the near future" and stuff hits the fan...or maybe they'll be "worth" far more in the future, hard to tell...

niftich 10y ago
This has worked with chat apps and other kinds of community-based social networks for ages, where the promise that after you've grown large, you'll figure out a way to monetize later. What's remarkable is Jet was able to pull this off by being in meatspace, by acting as a VC-subsidized arbitrage broker for consumer products, hoping to get enough mindshare to be considered more of a threat than a nuisance so it can get bought out. It worked!
morgante 10y ago
> I guess this goes to show that you too I'd be careful about drawing too many conclusions from this story. For one thing, you are not Marc Lore. With a successful Amazon sale under his belt, he certainly had a leg up on fundraising over almost anyone. His name alone helped to generate buzz. But even being Marc Lore is enough. I worked for his cofounder from diapers.com and you've probably never even heard of that company—building hype requires a compelling narrative, not just a big name.
- honkhonkpants 10y ago
  Never heard of diapers.com? No way. That site was/is incredible. Soap.com is still to this day how I go shopping on Amazon.
  - morgante 10y ago
    No, I meant you've probably never heard of his subsequent company (somespider.com), where I was the first employee.
cookiecaper 10y ago
It's just a misunderstanding of what the acquiring company is actually buying. When a company acquires a startup, they're doing it so they can get control over that startup's users. They really don't care about the technical or financial details, they just want authority over those millions of eyeballs.

niftich 10y ago

This has worked with chat apps and other kinds of community-based social networks for ages, where the promise that after you've grown large, you'll figure out a way to monetize later. What's remarkable is Jet was able to pull this off by being in meatspace, by acting as a VC-subsidized arbitrage broker for consumer products, hoping to get enough mindshare to be considered more of a threat than a nuisance so it can get bought out. It worked!

morgante 10y ago

> I guess this goes to show that you too I'd be careful about drawing too many conclusions from this story. For one thing, you are not Marc Lore. With a successful Amazon sale under his belt, he certainly had a leg up on fundraising over almost anyone. His name alone helped to generate buzz. But even being Marc Lore is enough. I worked for his cofounder from diapers.com and you've probably never even heard of that company—building hype requires a compelling narrative, not just a big name.

honkhonkpants 10y ago
Never heard of diapers.com? No way. That site was/is incredible. Soap.com is still to this day how I go shopping on Amazon.
- morgante 10y ago
  No, I meant you've probably never heard of his subsequent company (somespider.com), where I was the first employee.

cookiecaper 10y ago

It's just a misunderstanding of what the acquiring company is actually buying. When a company acquires a startup, they're doing it so they can get control over that startup's users. They really don't care about the technical or financial details, they just want authority over those millions of eyeballs.