Functionally, they have. * AOO has pretty much no development going on. * What few useful commits there are to AOO, get merged. And there aren't many at all.

Functionally, they have. * AOO has pretty much no development going on. * What few useful commits there are to AOO, get merged. And there aren't many at all. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=aoo/trunk&showmsg=1 https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=aoo/tru... * What few AOO developers there were ... keep showing up at LO. Because it turns out that's where the paying work is. Apache insists on holding onto the name, for no useful reason and to the active detriment of the end users who think they're getting a maintained product, rather than a 2010 codebase with a horrible security record (and an open vulnerability in the current download, with no fix date). But it appears nobody at Apache is interested in that.