5 ms·
California Company Gets Approval to Put Robotic Lander on Moon
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jpt4 10y agoFrom the article: First, Florida, not California. Second, the lede: "Moon Express, based in Cape Canaveral, Fla., announced Wednesday that it had received approval from the Federal Aviation Administration to set a robotic lander on the moon. That feat would win the Google Lunar X Prize competition for the first private organization to reach the moon and an accompanying $20 million reward."
- jmcdiesel 10y agoAnd why does anyone need permission to land on the moon?
- mikeash 10y agoFrom the article: The Outer Space Treaty prohibits nations from claiming sovereignty over the moon or other parts of the solar system. It also states: “The activities of nongovernmental entities in outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate state party to the treaty.”
- LastZactionHero 10y agoViolating the Outer Space Treaty would be a cool thing to go to jail for.
- mikeash 10y ago"What are you in for?" "Robbed a liquor store. You?" "Violated the Outer Space Treaty." "...huh..." I agree, if I had to go to prison for something, I'd pick that.
- erdevs 10y agoTrue. Though what would happen if you launched your lunar vehicle from a platform on international waters? Loophole? Or do we now get to mix in Maritime Law as well as the Outer Space Treaty, which is an even cooler jail story in the making...
- coldcode 10y agoI wonder if there are countries that didn't sign it.
- SixSigma 10y agoYes, quite a few https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty