5 ms·
This is going to get upvoted because of the title, I really hope that people read the actual article before posting. The worst part is that this women put her c
by ben_jones 10y ago
This is going to get upvoted because of the title, I really hope that people read the actual article before posting. The worst part is that this women put her children in extreme danger and had a history of instigating police and threatening extreme violence through social media.
Furthermore others on social media actively encouraged her violence which directly led to her death and serious injury to her children. It reminds me most of the school shooting in Oregon where the attacker was actively encouraged on internet forums to commit the act. Though like in that incident I think this women would have acted the same regardless.
- duaneb 10y agoI would advise avoiding commenting on how people vote. It is never interesting compared to just watching what happens.
- thelock85 10y agoAn alternate explanation is a woman was protecting her child from a threat --real, perceived or otherwise. Poor choice? Probably. But I think you've only explored one side of the story and a lot more information has become available in the last 12 hours.
- rbanffy 10y agoA shotgun is not a reasonable way to protect oneself from a state. The state probably has more police officers than you have bullets. You'll only make it worse.
- mywittyname 10y agoUnfortunately, the common narrative today to is to take up arms against what you perceive to be an oppressive government.
- stevenwiles 10y agoActually, the narrative today is to take up arms against the haters and anyone who tries to get between you and your dreams.